Agenda and minutes

Area Planning Committee Kettering - Monday 13th December, 2021 7.00 pm

Venue: Council Chamber, Municipal Offices, Bowling Green Road, Kettering, NN15 7QX

Contact: Callum Galluzzo  Email: callum.galluzzo@northnorthnants.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

63.

Apologies for non-attendance

Minutes:

None

64.

Members' Declarations of Interests

Minutes:

Councillor Kevin Thurland declared an interest in item 4.2 (KET/2020/0815) and indicated that he would leave the room during deliberation of this item.

65.

Minutes of the meeting held on 18th November 2021 pdf icon PDF 373 KB

Minutes:

RESOLVED               that the minutes of the meetings of the Area Planning Committee held on 18th November 2021 be approved as a correct record.

 

66.

Applications for planning permission, listed building consent and appeal information* pdf icon PDF 73 KB

Presented By: Planning Manager

Minutes:

The Committee considered the following applications for planning permission, which were set out in the Development Control’s Reports and supplemented verbally and in writing at the meeting. Seven speakers attended the meeting and spoke on applications in accordance with the Right to Speak Policy.

 

The reports included details of applications and, where applicable, results of statutory consultations and representations which had been received from interested bodies and individuals, and the Committee reached the following decisions:-.

67.

KET/2020/0449 pdf icon PDF 765 KB

Minutes:

Proposed Development

 

*4.1     s.73A Retrospective Application: Concrete batching plant and silos, office, welfare facilities and separate access at Blackbridge Farm, Cranford Road, Burton Latimer for Mr J Gough, Mick George Ltd

 

            Application No: KET/2020/0449

 

Speaker:

 

Murray Calder-Scott attended the meeting and addressed the committee as a third party objector to the proposed development raising concerns regarding the access road not being fit for purpose in its current condition. Mr Calder-Scott stated that the road was not wide enough to support the industrial use and that there was a major risk/danger to pedestrians

 

Councillor Jenny Davies attended the meeting and addressed the committee as a representative for Burton Latimer Town Council. Councillor Davies raised concerns regarding the hours of business prior to 7:00am which would have a detrimental impact on residential properties. Cllr Davies also stated that any conditions would need to be strictly enforced.

 

John Gough attended the meeting and addressed the committee as the agent on behalf of the applicant stating that the proposed development had received no objections from statutory consultees and that the development was compliant with local and national policy.

 

 

Decision

 

Members received a report about a proposal for which retrospective planning permission was being sought for a ready-mix concrete batching plant. The installation consisted of a batch control cabin, aggregate reception hopper bays, 2 x cementitious silos, batch conveyors, mixing unit and loading chute, aggregate storage bays, unit for mess room and office and access track.

 

The Planning officer addressed the committee and provided an update which stated that wording of condition 12 had been updated.

 

Members raised concerns regarding the condition and state of the access road and questioned whether or not North Northants Highways should investigate the roads condition.

 

It was confirmed to members that no comments had been submitted from the Highways department and member comments would be passed to the relevant Highways officers in order to raise concerns regarding the condition of the road.

 

Following debate it was proposed by Councillor Smyth and seconded by Councillor Prentice that the application be approved in line with the officer’s recommendation.

 

It was agreed that the application be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:

 

1.      The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of 3 years from the date of this planning permission.

 

2.      The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out other than in accordance with the approved plans and details listed below.

 

3.      The use hereby permitted shall permanently cease on the date that is 6 months from the date of this decision notice UNLESS before that date an air quality assessment to assess the impact of the development on local air quality and the community against the National Air Quality Standards and Objectives shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.  The submitted assessment shall identify the impact of the existing and proposed development and any exceedance of the air quality objectives, including any proposed mitigation measures. Once approved, the mitigation measures  ...  view the full minutes text for item 67.

68.

KET/2020/0815 pdf icon PDF 1 MB

Minutes:

Proposed Development

 

*4.2     Full Planning Permission: 14 no. dwellings with access road and associated works at Maplefields School, Beatrice Road, Kettering for Castlegate 772 Ltd.

 

            Application No: KET/2020/0815

 

Speaker:

 

Lesley Thurland attended the meeting and addressed the committee as a third party speaking in favour of the proposed development. It was stated that the proposed development was ideal for the local area and that the design was in keeping with neighbouring character.

 

Rhys Bradshaw attended the meeting and addressed the committee as the agent on behalf of the applicant stating that the main aim of the development was to maintain the front character of surrounding streets and that the house types reflect that of local styles.

 

 

Decision

 

Members received a report about a proposal for which full planning permission was being sought for 14 no. dwellings with access road and associated works. Five dwellings were proposed to front Beatrice Road comprising one bungalow and four x two storey detached houses. Five dwellings (two bungalows and three houses) fronting Britannia Road together with the vehicular access into the centre of the site where are a further four bungalows were proposed served off a private drive.

 

Members agreed that the application was satisfactory and raised no objection in contrary to the officers recommendation to approve the application

 

Following debate it was proposed by Councillor Jelley and seconded by Councillor Marks that the application be approved in line with the officer’s recommendation.

 

It was agreed that the application be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:

Text Box: (Having declared an interest in the following item, Councillor Kevin Thurland vacated his seat on committee during deliberation of this item)

1.      The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of 3 years from the date of this planning permission.

 

2.      The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out other than in accordance with the approved plans and details listed below.

 

3.      Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 3 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (or any Order revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification) no building, structure or other alteration permitted by Classes A to E of Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the Order shall be constructed on or within the curtilage of any of the houses hereby permitted.

 

4.      Prior to first occupation of the dwellings a scheme of landscaping which shall specify species, planting sizes, spacing and numbers of trees and shrubs to be planted and any existing trees to be retained shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. The approved scheme shall be carried out in the first planting and seeding seasons following the occupation of the building, unless these works are carried out earlier. Any newly approved trees or plants which, within a period of 5 years from the date of planting, die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of similar size and species.

 

5.  ...  view the full minutes text for item 68.

69.

NK/2021/0810 pdf icon PDF 877 KB

Minutes:

Proposed Development

 

*4.3     Full Planning Permission: Single storey rear extension to replace conservatory at 99 Braybrooke Road, Desborough for Mr & Mrs D Mitchell

 

            Application No: NK/2021/0810

 

Speaker:

 

Adrian Smith attended the meeting and addressed the committee as a third party objector to the proposed development raising concerns with regards to associated and shared utilities that run under the development. Concerns were also raised regarding the close proximity of the proposed development and the possible negative impact it may have on neighbouring vegetation.

 

Decision

 

Members received a report about a proposal for which full planning permission was being sought for a single storey rear extension to replace conservatory, measuring 7.1m in width and a maximum of 7.3m in depth with a pitched roof and bifold doors..

 

Members agreed that the application was satisfactory and raised no objection in contrary to the officers recommendation to approve the application

 

Following debate it was proposed by Councillor Carter and seconded by Councillor Jelley that the application be approved in line with the officer’s recommendation.

 

It was agreed that the application be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:

 

1.      The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of 3 years from the date of this planning permission.

 

2.      The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match, in type, colour and texture, those on the existing building.

 

3.      The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out other than in accordance with the approved plans and details listed below.

 

(Members voted on the officers’ recommendation to approve the application)

 

(Voting: Unanimous)

 

The application was therefore

APPROVED

 

 

 

 

 

70.

NK/2021/0814 pdf icon PDF 900 KB

Minutes:

Proposed Development

 

*4.4     Full Planning Permission: Change of Use from residential dwelling (C3) to 9 bed HMO (Sui Generis) at 1 Lindsay Street, Kettering for O.B Regency Property Management Ltd

 

            Application No: NK/2021/0814

 

Speaker:

 

None

 

Decision

 

Members received a report about a proposal for which full planning permission was being sought for the change of Use from residential dwelling (C3) to 9 bed HMO (Sui Generis)

 

Members raised questions regarding the number of waste facilities for the proposed development as well questions with regards to the landscaping associated with the proposed development

 

Members agreed that the application was satisfactory and raised no objection in contrary to the officer’s recommendation to approve the application

 

Following debate it was proposed by Councillor Jelley and seconded by Councillor Dell that the application be approved in line with the officer’s recommendation.

 

It was agreed that the application be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:

 

1.      The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of 3 years from the date of this planning permission.

 

2.      The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out other than in accordance with the approved plans and details listed below.

 

3.      The window materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match, in type, colour and texture, those on the existing building.

 

4.      The parking spaces hereby approved shall be provided prior to the first occupation of the building hereby permitted and shall be permanently retained and kept available for the parking of vehicles.

 

5.      Prior to first occupation of the development, details for the bicycle storage shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority and shall be retained as approved thereafter.

 

6.      Prior to first occupation of the development, details for the storage of refuse shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The use of the building shall not commence until the approved scheme has been fully implemented and shall be retained as approved thereafter.

 

7.      Prior to first occupation of the development a scheme of hard and soft landscaping works which shall specify species, planting sizes, spacing and numbers of trees and shrubs to be planted, any existing trees to be retained, the layout, contouring and surfacing of all open space areas shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. The works approved shall be carried out in the first planting and seeding seasons following the occupation of the building, unless these works are carried out earlier.  Any newly approved trees or plants which, within a period of 5 years from the date of planting, die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of similar size and species.

 

8.      Prior to the commencement of development a scheme for achieving the noise levels outlined in BS8233:2014 with regards to the residential units shall be submitted and approved in writing by the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 70.

71.

NK/2021/0829 pdf icon PDF 963 KB

Minutes:

Proposed Development

 

*4.5     Full Planning Permission: Change of use from open countryside to residential garden and erection of mobile home ancillary to the main dwelling at Suffolk Villa, Rushton Road, Rothwell for Mr M Harrison

 

            Application No: NK/2021/0829

 

Speaker:

 

Alex Jelley attended the meeting and addressed the committee as the agent on behalf of the applicant stating that the proposed development was not visible from the public domain and that the applicant had planted hedgerow on the southern boundary.

 

Decision

 

Members received a report about a proposal for which full planning permission was being sought  for the change of use from open countryside to residential garden and erection of mobile home ancillary to the main dwelling.

 

Members initially sought clarification regarding the proposed development stating that with conditions the proposed development could be considered not excessive in contradiction to the officers recommendation.

 

It was proposed by Councillor Marks that the application be approved contrary to the officer’s recommendation however as there was no seconder, the motion fell

 

Following debate it was then proposed by Councillor Jelley and seconded by Councillor Carter that the application be refused in line with the officer’s recommendation.

 

It was agreed that the application be REFUSED for the following reasons:

 

 

1.      The proposed development is located outside the settlement boundary of Rothwell in the open countryside. It is an unjustified form of development outside of the town boundary, contrary to both local and national planning policy. The proposal would have a detrimental impact upon the character of the area, creating an uncharacteristic development. The proposal does not seek to enhance the intrinsic quality of the countryside and as such the proposal conflicts with paragraph 80 of the National Planning Policy Framework, Policies 11 and 13 of the North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy and Policy RS4 of the Site Specific Part 2 Local Plan.

 

2.      The loss of the open countryside for residential land would alter the appearance and the character of this open land as there may be residential hard landscaping and large garden furniture which would be visible from the adjacent open space.  The siting and form of the proposed mobile home would result in an unacceptable incongruous and alien feature which would be visible from the adjacent open space within Rothwell and would be out of character with the locality.  The proposed development would erode the open character as viewed from the adjacent open space by encroaching into the open countryside. Thereby the proposal would have a harmful impact to the character of the locality contrary to Policy 8(d) (i) of the North Northamptonshire Joint Core Strategy (2016).

 

3.      The proposed development would represent overdevelopment of the site and would provide insufficient and unsafe levels of residential amenity for the future occupants of the site given the conflicting uses within the site.  There is no provision for refuse nor parking provision within the site, which would add conflicting pressure for amenity land in the proposed small rear garden for the mobile  ...  view the full minutes text for item 71.

72.

Planning appeal decision letters

73.

None Notified

74.

Close of Meeting